Відео

The technology is being rebuilt as we speak.

Why?

I'm shocked that people still believe this actually could be faked.

Yes.

Later analysis suggests it probably wasn't *that* close, but with the information they had at the time, they would've had to abort after those 15-20 seconds regardless.

“Total hoax and it never happened. Prove it happened.” Your logical fallacy is ‘Burden of Proof’. The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove. So put up or SHTFU.

Why would the CIA care about moon landings? Or, is that just the typical conspiracy theorist assumption about anything they don't like?

OK, even though the burden of proof is yours, I'll play the game. Here are the first 10 pieces of evidence that came to mind. I also included a typical denier's response. 1) There are thousands of photos available to the public of all 6 moon landing missions. (denier response; they’re all fake) 2) There are many hours of video of them as well, some received in real-time transmissions. (denier response; they’re all fake) 3) There are hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by scientists all over the world, and showed chemical and physical characteristics of not being terrestrial. (denier response; they’re meteorites from Antarctica, though every scientist on Earth disagrees) 4) The LRRR laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, 14, and 15 missions, are still interacted with today by using powerful lasers on Earth to measure lunar distance. (denier response; You don’t need mirrors to reflect lasers from moon, not understanding the difference between the reflected return of a 0.12 albedo object vs a retroreflector) 5) The photos of the Apollo landing sites taken by at least 3 lunar orbiters; LRO (USA), Chandrayaan-2 (India), and Chang'e 2 (China). Some showing descent stages, lunar rovers, deployed equipment, and paths traversed by the astronauts. (denier response; they’re all fake) 6) The ALSEP experiments packages that were deployed on the moon, and sent back scientific data to scientists on Earth for several years after the missions. (denier response; what’s an ALSEP?) 7) Mathematical analysis of the ballistic trajectory of the lunar regolith when kicked up by the lunar rovers provides a clear indication of 1/6G gravity and a vacuum environment, a condition that cannot be duplicated on Earth. (denier response; Math?) 8) Tracking of their voyages to the moon and back by radio telescopes around the world. (denier response; It was faked.) 9) Acceptance and congratulatory messages from the Soviet Union, our political adversaries and competitor in the space race. In fact, no country, friend or foe, has ever denied that the Apollo missions landed on the moon. (denier response; our sworn cold war enemy, who was spending billions to compete with the US, was somehow in on the conspiracy, and still is I assume, as is every other country) 10) The many thousands of scientists, engineers, technicians, and manufacturing and support staff, who spent a decade of their lives on the project, and the first hand testimony of the 24 men who traveled to the moon; none of whom have blown the whistle on the ‘fake moon landings’. (denier response; compartmentalization - the concept that you could put a dozen people in a room, and they could plan and execute a project to fake sending men to the moon 6 times over a four year period, and keep everyone else in the dark for over 50 years) The ball is now in your court to provide viable evidence to the contrary, in support of your claim that it was a hoax.

🥔

Prove it.

Watch a grade school dropout proudly flaunting his ignorance.

Prove it.

@@ArKritz84 it already has been. lol

@@robertsanzotera9591 no it hasn't. Lol.

Proof or SHTFU.

Prove it.

Prove it.

Why should we provide anything for an ignorant loser that is too lazy to do his own research?

I can see your problem. Nobody really cares about Pancakians, except for entertainment.

Prove it.

You have to have a rocket first. No rocket? No moon landing in 2024.

Because Congress cancelled the Apollo and Saturn programs, slashed the funding for manned lunar missions, and transferred anything left to the shuttle program. They refused to fund any deep space flight research for about 30 years, then finally authorized a pittance for the Artemis.

Lack of will and money.

NASA reality.

The usual amateur arguments long ago signed, sealed and filed under ‘DEBUNKED’ What else you got? 😂

Why do you simpleton persist with those pathetic lies? The Rijksmuseum Boerhaave in Leiden received the original lunar rocks in 1970. They still have them. The petrified wood was a mineral sample that the Museum of Arts and History in Amsterdam received from the estate of Willem Drees, Jr. Its curators failed to do their due diligence.

rewatch the first few seconds of this video: it said "nothing more important for long term space exploration"... funny coz now in hindsight, we have the time to see how many times they went back there...oh wait. it literally had 50 years of no advancements.

@@user-or4ct5ow6b 50 years of no advancement? Really? Deep space probes (Voyager I & II), Cassini probe, Skylab, Space Shuttles, ISS, self-landing rovers on Mars, Hubble and James Webb Space Telescope and now the SLS rocket and Orion capsule. We’ve seen great advancement in 50 years.

The piece of petrified wood that was given by the US ambassador to the former prime minister of the Netherlands had nothing to do with the real samples of the moon rocks. It wasn't said to be a "moon rock." Why didn't you research this thing before you made your baseless claim?

How do you fit mountains and craters inside a studio?

Still trying to figure it out?

Yes it did.

Sounds personal 🫢

That would be your education.

Russians obviously believed it. They aren't quite as dishonest as you are.

Except that the USSR tracked it, then the US received congratulations of conceit from the Soviet Academy of Sciences, the cosmonauts, and the Soviet premier.

Your husband is right.

It would be an interesting quote, if it were accurate. That's not what he said. He said destroyed. And it was, in the same sense that the technology to make a 1934 Ford was destroyed, or a Betamax recorder, or an SR-71, or any of thousands of other tools and products that are no longer made.

@@critthought2866 I never stated Buzz Aldrin said this!?

@@critthought2866 Why is your reply highlighted within 3 minutes of me posting?! There are thousands of replies. Winners of wars will always re-write history , and rulers will always conspiritize among each other...

@@critthought2866 We can replicate the ford, we can replicate the beta max, we cannot replicate going back to the moon !? Wake up!

@@KHANKHERJONG Nor did I say it was Aldrin. We all know that misquote came from Don Pettit.

Yes he did.

@@Lexi2019AURORA both feet, in fact.

Technically correct. His feet were encased in a pressure suit and an additional set of booties, so his bare feet never touched the lunar surface.

As time goes by, and it's been over fifty years since the last imaginary Moon landing, and we are unable to return to the Moon with 21st Century technology, more and more people's eyes are going to be opened, and we will realize that it was impossible to have gone to the Moon in 1969. It's only a matter of time. We cannot send men to the Moon today, and NASA keeps postponing the next manned Lunar mission. We are decades from ever sending men to the Moon, if ever. Time will vindicate me.

​​@@JamesFoard-le3nzTime has already left you in history's dust bin. Lunar probes from 4 different countries have photographed Apollo landing sites on the moon.

Given that one of the first things he did upon landing on the moon (after all the checklists, etc.) was to take communion, I don't think he's really got an issue with the big guy.

@@critthought2866I can understand why. I'm sure that he made a good confession before receiving Communion. Forgive me Father for I have sinned. Now he needs to go public. ​ @critthought2866 Well well well. Howdy RocketHead7. What a surprise. Just checked out your UA-cam channel. You're a ghost, you don't exist, you're an empty storefront; no videos, playlists, no community, no bio, nothing; you're the same UA-cam tech/troll who sets up fake accounts and haunts NASA and Creationist channels. You know how I know that? My responses to your replies get deleted. Only a UA-cam tech/troll could do that. We've met. You're not even man enough to use your real name. If Aldrin made a good confession then his sins at that time were forgiven, but the proof of the pudding is "Go and sin no more." Now, Thomas Aquinas, you don't just go to Communion once in your life, say for adultery, and then keep committing adultery and say, "Well, I went to Confessed it, so I'm fine". Same with lying, Once Saved Always Saved is a Calvinist doctrine, not Catholic. You need to read up on your instruction manual.

@@JamesFoard-le3nz So now you think he *is* right with God? You really need to make up your mind. After that, provide evidence that the landings were faked. Heck, start with proving that they *could* have faked them.

@@critthought2866 Well well well. Howdy RocketHead7. What a surprise. Just checked out your UA-cam channel. You're a ghost, you don't exist, you're an empty storefront; no videos, playlists, no community, no bio, nothing; the same UA-cam tech/troll who sets up fake accounts and haunts NASA and Creationist channels. We've met. You're not even man enough to use your real name. If Aldrin made a good confession then his sins at that time were forgiven, but the proof if the pudding is "Go and sin no more." You don't just go to Communion once in your life, say for adultery, and then keep committing adultery and say, "Well, I went to and Confessed it, I'm fine". Same with lying, Once Saved Always Saved is a Calvinist doctrine, not Catholic. You need to read up on your instruction manual.

​@@critthought2866 Well well well. Howdy RocketHead7. What a surprise. Just checked out your UA-cam channel. You're a ghost, you don't exist, you're an empty storefront; no videos, playlists, no community, no bio, nothing; you're the same UA-cam tech/troll who sets up fake accounts and haunts NASA and Creationist channels (I'm also a Creationist). You know how I know that? My responses to your replies get deleted. Only a UA-cam tech/troll could do that. We've met. You're not even man enough to use your real name. If Aldrin made a good confession then his sins at that time were forgiven, but the proof of the pudding is "Go and sin no more." Now, Thomas Aquinas, you don't just go to Communion once in your life, say for adultery, and then keep committing adultery and say, "Well, I went to Confessed it, so I'm fine". Same with lying, Once Saved Always Saved is a Calvinist doctrine, not Catholic. You need to read up on your instruction manual.

Any evidence that he's lying, beyond your assertion?